Denise Mouro, RN, research nurse at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Can...
Kenneth J. Pienta, MD, director of U-Ms Michigan Institute for Clinical and Heal...
Kenneth J. Pienta, MD, director of U-Ms Michigan Institute for Clinical and Heal...
nurse. After graduating from Royal Victoria Hospitals school of nursing in Montr...
Kenneth J. Pienta, MD, director of U-Ms Michigan Institute for Clinical and Heal...
WHS2009-Oct-17 |
(0) (0 Votes)
|
Views: (774) Date: (06-05-10) Time: (00:00:39) |
Description:
Working Session
Clinical Trials: Innovation, Regulation and Costs
Co-Host: German Research Foundation
Chairs: Jürgen Schölmerich | Vice President | German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)
Liselotte Højgaard | Professor & Director & Chair of the European Medical Research Council | Copenhagen
University Hospital
Outline: R&D productivity in the pharmaceutical industry as measured by bringing innovative therapeutics to market is at a low level. Clinical trials, the bedrock of pharmaceuticals R&D, have become the major time-consuming driver of costs and complexity.
The clinical paradigm is suffering from its regulatory burden, especially from complexity of varying national standards. It is not
prepared well to deal effectively with non-pharmacological therapeutics and advances such as personalized medicine and
regenerative medicine. Risk aversiveness is limiting the potential for new designs and statistical methods. The full potential of
patient stratification and use of biomarkers remains to be captured as well.
Furthermore, incentivation of industry on diseases with large patient populations and investigator-/academia-driven clinical
research under severe strain leaves many innovation opportunities untapped and, hence, public health needs unaddressed.
Especially investigator-driven clinical research is suffering from limited funding, lack of capabilities and huge complexity to deal
with (e.g., data sharing, intellectual property issues, regulatory burden).
In summary, we see untapped opportunities for innovation and a worsening trend of more complex regulations and more
complex protocols facing implementation challenges with too large patient populations. Academia, funding agencies, regulatory
agencies, and industry can resolve this multi-factorial issue only jointly.
This interactive working session will provide an insider’s view on the problem from the perspectives of investigators, funding
agencies, industry, and regulatory agencies. The aspiration is to conclude with a strong call for action on how to improve clinical
medical research in Europe and globally: how to limit the regulatory burden for national and multinational trials, how to optimize
targets and patient selection for clinical trials and how to assure trials of optimal statistical power, how to increase funding to
investigator-driven clinical trials, and how to capture benefits of scientific advances through encouraging new designs. This task
calls for collaboration of all relevant stakeholders.
11.00 Problem Statement
Jürgen Schölmerich | Vice President | German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)
11.05 The Investigator’s Perspective
Brian Feagan | Director of Robarts Clinical Trials | Robarts Research Institute
Multiple issues should be considered in selecting patients for clinical trials. True experiments in humans must be conducted under optimal ethical and scientific conditions with patient safety being the ultimate consideration. Frequently tension exists between
selecting patients that are most likely to respond to an intervention (efficacy) and assessment of the intervention’s benefit in the
“real world” (effectiveness). Designers of clinical trials must make wise decisions regarding patient selection if meaningful results
are to be obtained. Examples from recent clinical trials will be used to explore these issues.
&nb