Science 2.0 was founded because, contrary to the beliefs of some scientists and some journalists, the public is really, really smart. And they know a lot of science, they just frame it through politics more than they used to because scientists and journalists are less diverse politically than they once were.
~ means of Frances Martel | 2:02 pm, April 5th, 2010~Mediaite-We previously chronicled the accuracy of the Daily Beast’s attempts to violent the most influential liberals and conservatives in American media. Over the weekend the online warehouse attempted a similar endeavor with the “Top 25 Centrist Columnists and Commentators,” and it’s about as flawed as [...]
In the hope that Star Trek-like replicators are close at hand, one journalist gives credence to the idea that molecular manufacturing will be a reality by 2020
But...but...you have to love journalists, according to journalists. Only we hold government accountable and gotcha videos and bloggers rehashing what we come up with or they see in press releases can't be the same thing, they insist.
But...but...you have to love journalists, according to journalists. Only we hold government accountable and gotcha videos and bloggers rehashing what we come up with or they see in press releases can't be the same thing, they insist.
Texas A&M University at Qatar welcomed over 50 science journalists to the Texas A&M Engineering Building recently for tours of the University’s research centers and laboratories. The tours, organized in collaboration with the World Conference of Science Journalists, enabled Texas A&M at Qatar to share its research and scholarship with the science community.
In June, the School of Communication at American University hosted a workshop for journalists on effective coverage of election polling. You can read about the workshop at a web story penned by AU staffer Mike Unger.
By Konrad Lawson, ProfHacker Chronicle of Higher Education
