Group - Time lapse camera comparison--Brinno vs Wingscapes vs King Jim Recolo

http://photocamel.com/forum/canon-forum/79862-canon-discloses-camera-shutter-life-expectancy.html || The limited DSLR shutter life:–> 1 min a photo for 10 days will cost you 14,400 shots! Supposed DSLR life 100,000 shots only. i.e 8 times of 10 days time lapse shooting then you are completely toasted!! think about this:Will you drive your Ferrari from LA to New York? 2,400 mi or 4,000 km? you can but you won’t.Extra batteries, cards and the interval are needed to prepared. then you probably need to wake up at mid night to replace the batteries and SD cards. Unless you were James Cameron's dive in Mariana trench then go ahead DSLR for your historical deepest time lapse video. Use DSLR for time lapseforyour lifetime shot.Reason2: Why not time lapse apps on the smartphone?normally it won’t last for half a day with camera on). The other issue is you simply cannot use you phone for shooting many hours time lapse only without moving around. And how about your facebook?The big dig --Wingscapes vs Brinno vs Kimg jin RecoloIs the resolution the key differentiation?A camera capable of 3.1 megapixels has a sensor that can capture an image of 2048 pixels by 1536 pixels, because 2048 times 1536 = 3.1M pixels. If you think about this for a second, you’ll quickly see how out of control the megapixel myth has gotten. A 3.1 megapixels digital camera shoots more pixels than is crisply displayed on a 60-inch, 1080p (1920 x 1080 = 2.1 megapixels) HDTV showing a Blu-Ray movie. But most people use digital cameras to take 4 x 6 inch prints. Megapixel count is not an accurate reflection of a camera’s quality, end of story.Your cellphone probably has enough megapixels to comfortably blow up to a poster-sized print. Unless you need to do more than that, buy a camera with the least amount of megapixels as possible.Wingscape plantcam's photo fidelity is lower as up to 8MP if you are not choosing the related sensors. Remember ---the more expensive the camera with the lower the megapixel count, the larger the included sensor is likely to be. The Wingscapes plantcam seems to have a higher resolution than its real sensor size which results in final photo quality.How is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzwxwqO80jE&feature=related || Recolo 0.3 MP(640×480) doing? Take a look and you can tell me the answer---http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PMb1cTC4Ug || The Recolo is simply no match to the rest two especially in photo quality.Comparison the power consumption for Recolo vs Brinno:the Recolo peak current is 373mA for 2.5V input voltage needs 3 seconds to capture one frame.The Brinno is 44mA for 5V voltage only 0.8 seconds to capture one frame.5 seconds time interval testing for battery life:Recolo: 2 AA batteries, capture 6,250 frames for 5 seconds time intervalBrinno: 4 AA , capture 300,000 frames for 5 seconds Wingscape Plantcam vs. Brinno time lapse camera TLC 200 in powerpower needed for capturing one frame:Wingscapes : 10,030 mW-SecBrinno : 140 (70:1)Capturing time for one frame:Wingscapes: 15SecBrinno: 0.8~1 (15:1)ResultBrinno time lapse camera TLC 200 emerges the leader of all by the total balance in resolution, photo quality and power management. http://www.brinno.com || Time lapse camera, http://www.brinno.ca || brinno time lapse camera, http://www.smartecstore.com || brinno time lapse camera