Techniques at acharya sri rakum school for the blind
Engineering researchers such as Babak Parviz are studying nature on the nanoscale to create the next...
Two dimensional graphs of an egg generated from an equation containg sines & cosines, solutions for ...
We all start off thinking there is just the one time the same for everyone. Professor Russell Stanna...
Professor Russell Stannard explores the nature of matter and how complete our understanding of matte...
PubMed |
(0) (0 Votes)
|
Views: (7) Date: (1986-7-1) Pages: () |
Abstract: An extensive network of empirical relations has been identified in research on the psychological construct of self-monitoring. Nevertheless, in recent years some concerns have been expressed about the instrument used for the assessment of self-monitoring propensities, the Self-Monitoring Scale. Both the extent to which the measure taps an interpretable and meaningful causal variable and the extent to which the self-monitoring construct provides an appropriate theoretical understanding of this causal variable have been questioned. An examination of reanalyses of studies of self-monitoring, analyses of the internal structure of the Self-Monitoring Scale, and further relevant data suggest that the measure does tap a meaningful and interpretable causal variable with pervasive influences on social behavior, a variable reflected as a general self-monitoring factor. We discuss the evaluation and furthering of the interpretation of this latent causal variable, offer criteria for evaluating alternative measures of self-monitoring, and present a new, 18-item Self-Monitoring Scale.