This video demonstrates the behavior of microtubules and of the membrane network of the ER. This vid...
Michael McGehee, associate professor of Materials Science and Engineering at Stanford University, an...
pathways) All of these are highly conserved, line up with evolutionary divergences, and show predict...
Experimento demostrando el uso de los espectrómetros de ocean optics para hacer mediciones de absor...
ATP synthaes is a molecular machine that works like a turbine to convert the energy stored in a prot...
| rlanzara |
(0) (0 Votes)
|
Views: (260) Date: (18-05-09) Pages: () |
Abstract: - This study analyzes 16 molecular dynamic simulations of a biophysical model for β2-adrenergic (B2AR) and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation. In this model, a highly conserved cysteine residue, C106 (C3.25 or CysIII:01), provides a free sulfhydryl or thiol group in an acid–base equilibrium between uncharged (RSH) and charged (RS−) states that functions as an electrostatic molecular switch for receptor activation. The transition of C106 in the B2AR between acid and base states significantly changes the helical/transmembran e (TM) domain interactions and the electrostatic interaction energy differences (ΔΔEEL). The ΔΔEEL changes correlate well with the experimentally observed ligand efficacies. The TM interaction energies display patterns compatible with those previously recognized as responsible for GPCR activation. Key differences between the agonist, epinephrine, and the antagonist, pindolol, are seen for the TM3 × 6, TM3 × 4, TM6 × 7 and TM1 × 7 interaction energies. Pindolol also produces a weaker ΔΔEEL interaction and less TM interaction energy changes, which are important differences between the agonist and antagonist ligands. The D115E mutant with pindolol displays a greater ΔΔEEL and TM interactions than for the wild-type B2AR with pindolol. This explains the higher activity of pindolol in the D115E mutant. The constitutively active D130A mutant displays TM interaction patterns similar to those for the activating ligands implying a common pattern for receptor activation. These findings support the broad concept of protean agonism and demonstrate the potential for allosteric modulation. They also demonstrate that this two-state model agrees with many previous experimental and theoretical observations of GPCRs. Keywords: Molecular dynamics; Two-state model; G protein-coupled receptor model; B2AR adrenergic receptor; Sulfhydryl; Electrostatic molecular switch; Receptor activation Abbrev iations: B2AR, β2-adrenergic receptor; DTT, dithiolthreitol; D130A, the B2AR aspartate residue 130 to alanine mutation; D113E, the B2AR aspartate residue 113 to glutamate mutation; EPI, epinephrine; ΔEL, the energy difference between the base and acid states for the electrostatic energy terms; ΔΔEEL, electrostatic interaction energy differences; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; Gs, stimulatory GTP-binding regulatory protein of adenylylcyclase; ΔLJ, the energy difference between the base and acid states for the Lennard–Jones energy terms; MD, molecular dynamics; NE, norepinephrine; PIN, pindolol; RMSD, root mean square deviation; ΔRH, the net change in a high affinity receptor state; TM, transmembrane