A video guide to life and study at the University of Edinburgh.
Joseph Finder, case author and renowned writer of corporate thrillers. Discuss the new climate for c...
by anonymous contributor through Professor Rev. Dr. James Kenneth Powell II, opensourcebuddhism.org ...
Human Resources Implications for the Financial Industry
Introduction to New Testament (RLST 152) This course approaches the New Testament not as scripture, ...
citeseer |
(0) (0 Votes)
|
Views: (1012) Date: (15-05-09) Pages: () |
Abstract: In the last two decades, a number of algorithms for the linear single-commodity Min Cost Flow problem (MCF) have been proposed, and several efficient codes are available that implement different variants of the algorithms. The practical significance of the algorithms has been tested by comparing the time required by their implementations for solving "from scratch" instances of (MCF), of different classes, as the size of the problem (number of nodes and arcs) increases. However, in many applications several closely related instances of (MCF) have to be sequentially solved, so that reoptimization techniques can be used to speed up computations, and the most attractive algorithm is the one which minimizes the total time required to solve all the instances in the sequence. In this paper we compare the performances of four different efficient implementations of algorithms for (MCF) under cost reoptimization in the context of decomposition algorithms for the Multicommodity Min Cost Flow problem (MMCF), showing that for some classes of instances the relative performances of the codes doing "from scratch" optimization do not accurately predict the relative performances when reoptimization is used. Since the best solver depends both on the class and on the size of the instance, this work also shows the usefulness of a standard interface for (MCF) problem solvers that we have proposed and implemented.